1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT R. SHIPLEY, No. 2:24-cv-00032-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANISE ADAMS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Scott Shipley (“Plaintiff”) proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On August 13, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 28 analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 13, 2025 (ECF No. 23) are adopted in 3 full; 4 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 21) is DENIED; 5 3. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is dismissed without further leave to amend; and 6 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively terminate any pending motions and 7 close the case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Date: September 25, 2025 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28