1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIE LEE BROOKS, II, No. 2:22-cv-0062-TLN-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RAINELLE SMITH, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Willie Lee Brooks, II (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil 18 rights action pursuant to

. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On August 15, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections 22 within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 28 analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 15, 2025 (ECF No. 132) are 3 | adopted in full. 4 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (ECF No. 129) is denied. 5 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further 6 | proceedings. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 | Date: September 25, 2025

10 11 TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28