1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE GUADALUPE VASQUEZ, No. 2:24-cv-00684-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MARKET SQUARE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jose Guadalupe Vasquez (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under

. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On July 28, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has not 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 28 analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 14) are adopted in full; and 3 2. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in the 4 April 1, 2025, Screening Order (ECF No. 10). See L.R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);

1915A. IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Date: September 26, 2025 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28