1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SORAYA MARIA RIGOR, No. 2:25-cv-00243-TLN-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Soraya Maria Rigor (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was 18 referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and

(b)(1). 19 On August 27, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has 22 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, but did file a First Amended Complaint 23 (“FAC”) (ECF No. 7) during the 14-day period for objections. The Court will construe the FAC 24 as an objection. 25 In accordance with the provisions of

(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 26 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 27 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 28 analysis. The findings and recommendations stated that Plaintiff’s claims were barred by Heck v. 1 Humphrey,

(1994) and the applicable statute of limitations, and that further leave to 2 amend would be futile. (ECF No. 6 at 5-6.) Consideration of the FAC, which again alleges that a 3 2008 conviction was wrongful, does not undermine the findings and recommendations. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 27, 2025, are adopted in full; 6 2. The complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to

(e) 7 and without further leave to amend; and 8 3. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment and close this file. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Date: September 29, 2025 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28