Donald Joshua Smith v. Chaudhry Uzma, et al.
Donald Joshua Smith v. Chaudhry Uzma, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD JOSHUA SMITH, Case No. 2:24-cv-00683-TLN-JDP 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CHAUDHRY UZMA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Donald Joshua Smith (“Plaintiff”), a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, 18 filed this civil rights action seeking relief under
42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 3, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25 F.2d 207, 208(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey,
481 F.3d 1143, 1147(9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 28 analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 3, 2025, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Defendant Uzma’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 47) is GRANTED and this action is 4 dismissed without prejudice. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATE: September 30, 2025 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown