Milo L. Oliver v. Metro Transit, Alpha Project and Humane Society
Milo L. Oliver v. Metro Transit, Alpha Project and Humane Society
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MILO L. OLIVER, Case No.: 25-cv-2932-AJB-VET BOOKING #25730390 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO Plaintiff, 13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS vs. AND DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION 14
15 METRO TRANSIT, ALPHA PROJECT 16 and HUMANE SOCIETY, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Milo L. Oliver, a San Diego County Jail detainee proceeding pro se, has 20 filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983along with a motion to proceed 21 in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Doc. Nos. 1–2.) 22 I. Motion to Proceed IFP 23 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 24 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 25 $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55, 26 although the administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP. 27 See
28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee 28 Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023)). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 1 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes,
493 F.3d 1047, 1051(9th Cir. 2007). Section 3 1915(a)(2) requires prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP to submit a “certified copy of 4 the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period 5 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.”
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. 6 King,
398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the 7 Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account 8 for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six 9 months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has insufficient assets. See 28 U.S.C. 10 §§ 1915(b)(1)&(4); Bruce v. Samuels,
577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016). Prisoners who proceed IFP 11 must pay any remaining balance in “increments” or “installments,” regardless of whether 12 their action is ultimately dismissed.
28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(b)(1)&(2); Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84. 13 Plaintiff’s IFP application does not contain a trust fund account statement. (See ECF 14 No. 2.) The Court cannot grant his IFP application without a trust fund account statement 15 containing financial information for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing 16 of his Complaint. See Andrews, 398 F.3d at 1119 (“[P]risoners must demonstrate that they 17 are not able to pay the filing fee with an affidavit and submission of their prison trust 18 account records.”) (citing
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1)&(2)). 19 Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. This action 20 is DISMISSED without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee or to 21 submit a properly supported motion to proceed IFP pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 22 1915(a). 23 II. Conclusion and Order 24 Accordingly, the Court: 25 (1) DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP without prejudice. 26 (2) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to 27 pay the civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a properly supported motion to 28 proceed IFP pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a). 1 (3) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is filed 2 || to: (a) prepay the entire $405 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and 3 || file a properly supported motion to proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his 4 || prison trust account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. 5
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $405 6 || civil filing fee or submit a properly supported motion to proceed IFP within 45 days, this 7 |{action will remain dismissed without prejudice based solely on his failure to satisfy
8 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee requirement and without further Order of the Court. 9 IT ISSO ORDERED 10 || Dated: November 21, 2025 © ¢ Hon. Anthony J. attaglia 12 United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
Reference
- Status
- Unknown