Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. California Department of Child Support...

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, No. 1:25-cv-00981 JLT EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 v. (Doc. 8) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, et al., Defendants.

On August 22, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause regarding preliminary injunction. (Doc. 8.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on the Plaintiff and notified him that objections were due in 30 days. (Id. at 5.) The Court advised him that his “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id. (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).)

Plaintiff did not file any objections, and the time to do so has passed.

According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. The findings and recommendations issued on August 22, 2025, (Doc. 8), are ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. Plaintiff’s ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and order to show 1 cause regarding preliminary injunction (Doc. 3) is DENIED.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

4| Dated: _ October 10, 2025 Charis [Tourn ; TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE