United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 2025

Jo Ann Hoeppner-Cruz v. Robert W Brower

Jo Ann Hoeppner-Cruz v. Robert W Brower
United States District Court for the Northern District of California · Decided November 24, 2025
Jo Ann Hoeppner-Cruz v. Robert W Brower

Trial Court Opinion

2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JO ANN HOEPPNER-CRUZ, Case No. 24-cv-05170-TSH 6 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 7 v. ROBERT W BROWER, 9 Defendant.

11 Plaintiff Jo Ann Hoeppner-Cruz, in her capacity as the Trustee of The Anthony J. Freitas and Jacqueline Hoeppner-Freitas 1997 Revocable Trust, brings this case under California Probate Code section 17200 against Defendant Robert Brower related to the sale of property under the Trust. ECF No. 1. The case is scheduled for jury trial on January 20, 2026. ECF No. 44.

15 On November 12, 2025, the Court ordered supplemental briefing addressing whether the probate exception applies to each of the claims in this case. ECF No. 56. The Court ordered Brower to file a brief by November 18, 2025, and Hoeppner-Cruz to file a response by November 21, 2025. Id. Brower filed a brief on November 14, 2025. ECF No. 57.

19 Hoeppner-Cruz failed to file a response in compliance with the Court’s order at ECF No. 56. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte if a plaintiff fails to comply with court orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see Yourish v. Cal. Amplifier, 191 F.3d 983, 987– 88 (9th Cir. 1999) (affirming dismissal for failure to comply with court orders). Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Hoeppner-Cruz to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with court deadlines. Hoeppner-Cruz shall file a declaration by December 1, 2025, and simultaneously file either an opposition or a statement of nonopposition in response to Brower’s brief at ECF No. 57. If Hoeppner-Cruz files an opposition, Brower may file any reply by December 3, 2025.

1 admission that you do not intend to prosecute, and this case will likely be dismissed. Thus, it is || imperative the Court receive a written response by the deadline above.

3 The Court hereby ORDERS Hoeppner-Cruz’s counsel of record, Thomas Dwayne Reid, to || provide a copy of this order to Hoeppner-Cruz and file an attestation to that effect no later than December 1, 2025.

6 IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 Dated: November 24, 2025 THOMAS S. HIXSON 10 United States Magistrate Judge

= 17 Z 18

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.