1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARLA S. G.,1 Case No. CV 8:24-01766 VBF (RAO) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF 14 FRANK J. BISIGNANO,2 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Commissioner of Social Security, JUDGE 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to

, the Court has reviewed the complaint, all of the 18 other records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States 19 Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Plaintiff filed objections to the Report, and the 20 Commissioner filed a subsequent reply. The Court is not persuaded by any of 21 Plaintiff’s objections for the reasons stated in the Report and the Commissioner’s 22 reply. See Morgan v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin.,

(9th Cir. 1999) 23 (“[W]hen evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation, the ALJ’s 24 25 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the 26 recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 27 2 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Frank J. Bisignano, 28 the Commissioner of Social Security, is hereby substituted as the defendant. 1 conclusion must be upheld.”). Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts and adopts the 2 findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 3 IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is 4 AFFIRMED. 5 6 DATED: November 25, 2025 _____/_s_/ _V_a_l_er_i_e_ B_a_k_e_r_ F_a_i_r_b_an_k__________ 7 VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28