1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Clear View Enterprises, LLP, No. 2:22-cv-01119-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 Elizabeth Beauvil, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Clear View Enterprises, LLP is pursuing claims in this action against defendants 18 | Elizabeth Beauvil, Global Empire Holdings LLC, Lawrence Albano, and Chelsea Jones. Albano 19 | and Global Empire Holdings later filed cross claims against Beauvil and Tanpri Media & Arts, 20 | Inc. The Clerk’s Office entered the default of Beauvil and Tanpri in July 2025. ECF Nos. 62-63. 21 | On September 10, 2025, the court set a thirty-day deadline for any motion for default judgment. 22 | ECF No. 64. Clear View, Albano and Global Empire Holdings now stipulate and jointly request 23 | an extension of that deadline. ECF No. 65. They explain the claims against all defendants are 24 | intertwined and ask the court to defer consideration of a motion for default judgment until any 25 | damages can be ascertained. /d. at 3. 26 The stipulated request is granted. See Garamendi v. Henin,

(9" Cir. 27 | 2012) (summarizing rule that when defendants are “similarly situated,” and one of them defaults, 28 | “judgment should not be entered against the defaulting defendant until the matter has been

1 | adjudicated with regard to all defendants”) (quoting Jn Neilson v. Chang (In re First T.D. & 2 | Investment, Inc.),

(9th Cir. 2001)). 3 The deadline for motions for default judgment against Beauvil and Tanpri is extended to 4 | thirty days from the date the court enters dismissal or judgment, as applicable, against cross- 5 | claimants Albano and Global Empire Holdings. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | DATED: October 15, 2025. ot STATES DISTRICT JUDGE