1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 A. H., Case No. 22-cv-03233-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL 9 v. BRIEFING ON SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 10 WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 104 Defendants. qa 12

13 Before the Court is a motion for summary judgment from Defendants Summer Sigler and

v 14 || West Contra Costa Unified School District. Defendants seek summary judgment on all of Plaintiff

15 || A.H.’s remaining causes of action. Only one of the remaining causes of action arises under Q 16 || federal law: discrimination in violation of Title IX against the District.

= 17 The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the following Z 18 || question: 19 In light of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger,

(2025), may the Court 20 exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's remaining state law claims if it determines that the Title [X cause of action fails on 21 the merits? 22 || The parties’ supplemental briefs shall not exceed three (3) pages in length and must be filed by no 23 later than 10:00 a.m. on Friday, December 12, 2025. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 8, 2025 26 - □□ 27 : ARACELI MARTINEZ-OLGUIN 28 United States District Judge