1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 RONALD CUPP, Case No. 25-cy-07479-TSH 6 Plaintiff, 7 y. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 8 TA FINTECH, INC., 9 Defendant. 10 11 On November 17, 2025, the Court vacated the hearing on Plaintiff Ronald Cupp’s pending 12 || motion for default judgment and directed him to file a supplemental declaration by December 1, 5 13 || 2025. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has failed to respond. S 14 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte if a plaintiff fails to 3 15 || prosecute their action or fails to comply with court orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); see Link v. 16 Wabash R.R. Co.,

(1962) (dismissal for failure to prosecute); Yourish v. Cal. 5 17. || Amplifier,

, 987 (9th Cir. 1999) (dismissal for failure to comply with court orders). 5 1g || Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed 19 || for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration 20 by December 24, 2025 and simultaneously file a supplemental brief in compliance with the 1 Court’s November 13 order. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an 3 admission that you do not intend to prosecute, and this case will likely be dismissed. Thus, it is A imperative the Court receive a written response by the deadline above. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: December 10, 2025 27 LAA. THOMAS S. HIXSON 28 United States Magistrate Judge