UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:25-cv-08641-AB (RAOx) Date: December 11, 2025

Title: Moshik Nadav, et al. v. Rio Beauty Lounge, Inc., et al.

Present: The Honorable ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge

Evelyn Chun N/A

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):

None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or before December 19, 2025, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff’s response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

☒ Plaintiff obtained entry of default as to Defendant Rio Beauty Loung, Inc. (Dkt. 14), pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), but Plaintiff has not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter. IT IS SO ORDERED.