Shelton Benoite v. J. Doerer, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SHELTON BENOITE , No. 1:25-cv-00959-SAB (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION 10 SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED v. (ECF No. 6) 11 J. DOERER, et al., 12 Defendants.
14 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens 15 v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
16 On September 8, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable | claims, and granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has | not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so || has passed. Accordingly, itis HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within | fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed | for failure to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a | tecommendation to dismiss the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 Af 95 Dated: _ October 20, 2025 STANLEY A. BOONE 26 United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.