Alton Singleton v. Unknown

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Alton Singleton v. Unknown

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALTON SINGLETON, No. 2:25-cv-2025 WBS CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a Sacramento County Jail prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights 18 action seeking relief under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 8, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

25 F.2d 207, 208

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

708 F.2d 452

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 27 reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 28 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 8, 2025, are adopted in full; and 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 4 || Dated: October 22, 2025 /, 4 , . 4k. 2 5 WILLIAMB.SHUBB 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown