1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZENAIDA CORDOVA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00482 JLT HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECCOMENDATION IN FULL 13 v.

14 OFFICER GREG RODRIGUEZ, ACTING WARDEN MICHAEL (Docs. 16, 35) 15 PALLARES, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On September 29, 2025, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued Findings and 19 Recommendations granting Defendant Pallares’ motion to dismiss, but allowing Plaintiff leave to 20 amend her Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant Pallares. (Doc. 35 at 1.) The Court 21 served the Findings and Recommendations on the parties and notified them that any objections 22 were to be filed within 14 days. (Id. at 12.) The Court also warned the parties that failure to 23 timely file objections “may result in the waiver of certain rights on appeal.” (Id. (citing 24 Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

(9th Cir. 2014).) No party has filed objections and the 25 time to do so has passed. (See docket.) 26 According to

(b)(1)(C), this Court performed a de novo review of this 27 case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and 28 Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on September 29, 2025 (Doc. 35) are 2 ADOPTED in full. 3 2. Defendant Pallares’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. 4 3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendant 5 Pallares and Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint within 6 twenty-one days of this order. 7 g IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 | Dated: _ October 24, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28