1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONNIE WINN, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:22-CV-0706-TLN-DMC-P 13 v. 14 M. ZUNIGA, ORDER 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Ronnie Winn (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights 18 action pursuant to

. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On September 10, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within 22 fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 49.) This deadline has passed and no objections to the findings and 23 recommendations have been filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”). 28 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 1 | the record and by the proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 10, 2025, (ECF No. 49), are 4 ADOPTED in full. 5 2. Defendant’s unopposed motion for summary judgment, (ECF No. 44), is granted. 6 3. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment and close this file. 7 | Date: October 24, 2025 TROY L. NUNLEY 10 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28