1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDDIE JONES, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-1274-TLN-CKD 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF ORDER CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Eddie Jones (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights 18 action seeking relief under

. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 11, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”). 28 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 1 | the record and by the proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 3 1. The findings and recommendations, (ECF No. 6), are ADOPTED in full; 4 2. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without leave to amend for failure to state a claim; 5 and 6 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 7 | Date: October 24, 2025 10 TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28