1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON OSBUN, No. 2:25-cv-2665 CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MARK DULYANI, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed September 22, 2025, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a completed 18 in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his jail trust account statement. (ECF No. 6.) 19 Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file these documents would result in a recommendation that 20 this action be dismissed. (Id.) The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 21 responded to the Court’s order and has not filed the required documents. 22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 23 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 24 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th Cir. 1991). 4 5 Dated: October 31, 2025 6 Aan Spe CHI SOO KIM 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 1] 12 || Osbu2665.fifp/2 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28