United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

Amanda Anne Harris v. Department of Social Services of Lincoln County, et al.

Amanda Anne Harris v. Department of Social Services of Lincoln County, et al.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided November 3, 2025
Amanda Anne Harris v. Department of Social Services of Lincoln County, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AMANDA ANNE HARRIS, Case No. 2:24-cv-0253-DC-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF LINCOLN COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

17 On August 21, 2025, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and dismissed it for failure to establish subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 4. I ordered plaintiff to file, within thirty days, either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action. Id. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order.

21 The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110 (“Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.”). A court may dismiss an action based on a party’s failure to prosecute an action, failure to obey a court order, or failure to comply with local rules. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (dismissal for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with local rules).

1 I will give plaintiff a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for her | failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs failure to respond to this order will constitute | another failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action | bedismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within fourteen days why this case | should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with court orders, and failure to | state aclaim. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within fourteen | days, an amended complaint.

9 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ October 31, 2025 Q_—_—.

11 JEREMY D. PETERSON Db UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.