1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUCIO JUSTO RAMOS CARRILLO, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-2311-TLN-CKD P 13 v. 14 DUTCH EMBASSY, et al., ORDER 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Lucio Justo Ramos Carrillo (“Plaintiff”), a San Joaquin County Jail prisoner 18 proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under

. The matter 19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local 20 Rule 302. 21 On September 26, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 6.) This deadline has 24 passed, and no objections have been filed. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 28 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”). 1 | Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 2 | the record and by the proper analysis. See also Ferdik v. Bonzelet,

(9th 3 | Cir. 1992) (dismissing case for failure to comply with court order). 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 26, 2025, (ECF No. 6), are 6 ADOPTED in full; and 7 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 8 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 9 | Date: November 3, 2025 10 11 7, 12 TROY L. NUNLEY B CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28