Pablo Chavez v. Kings County Jail Well Path Medical, et al.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Pablo Chavez v. Kings County Jail Well Path Medical, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PABLO CHAVEZ, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01154 JLT CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 13 v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY AND 14 KINGS COUNTY JAIL WELL PATH FAILURE TO PROSECUTE MEDICAL, et al., 15 (Doc. 19) Defendants. 16

17

18 Pablo Chavez seeks to hold defendants liable for violations of his constitutional rights. 19 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On October 23, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and 22 Recommendations to Dismiss Action Without Prejudice for Plaintiff’s Failure to Obey Local 23 Rules and Failure to Prosecute. (Doc. 19.) Specifically, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed 24 to keep the Court apprised of his current address. (Id. at 2-5.) The Court served the Findings and 25 Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id. 26 at 6.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may 27 result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

772 F.3d 834

, 838-39 1 | other mail directed to Plaintiff at his address on file with the Court,! the Findings and 2 || Recommendations were returned by the United States Postal Service marked “Undeliverable, 3 | RTS, Inactive 4/20/2025, NIC” on November 4, 2025. 4 According to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court conducted a de novo review of this 5 | case. Having reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 6 | to be supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 7 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued October 23, 2025, (Doc. 19), are 8 ADOPTED in full. 9 2. This action is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for Plaintiff's failure to obey the Local 10 Rules and failure to prosecute; and 11 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case and terminate any deadlines. 12 B IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: _ November 7, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

' See Docket Entries dated 9/22/2025 and 10/20/2025. 2

Reference

Status
Unknown