Joseph Earl Steele v. F. Martinez

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Joseph Earl Steele v. F. Martinez

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH EARL STEELE, No. 1:25-cv-00187 JLT BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 13 v. ACTION 14 F. MARTINEZ, (Doc. 14) 15 Defendant. 16 17 The magistrate judge screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and 18 recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which 19 relief may be granted. (Doc. 14.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on 20 plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id. at 7.) The Court also 21 informed Plaintiff that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver 22 of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id. at 8, quoting 23 Wilkerson v. Wheeler,

772 F.3d 834, 839

(9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and 24 time in which to do so has expired. 25 According to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the 26 case. Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court finds the Findings and 27 Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Thus, the Court 28 ORDERS: 1 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on October 1, 2025, (Doc. 14), are 2 ADOPTED. 3 2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief 4 may be granted. 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: _ November 8, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown