1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL ALAN DEAN HILL, No. 2:25-cv-0433 DAD CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 LT. PAYNE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On May 14, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The amended 18 complaint was due on October 30, 2025. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 20 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 21 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 22 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 23 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 24 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 25 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: November 12, 2025 Card Kt | / ye □□□ 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 hill0433.fta(2) 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28