1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICARDO CARMICHAEL, ET AL., No. 2:23-cv-1075-DJC-DMC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DAN FITZGERALD & ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16

17 AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIMS. 18

19 20 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action. 21 Plaintiffs have filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to a written and fully 22 executed settlement agreement among all parties. See ECF No. 52. The motion is unopposed. 23 Good cause appearing therefor, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed with 24 prejudice consistent with the parties’ agreement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / ] Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends as follows: 2 1. Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal, ECF No. 52, be 3 || granted. 4 2. This action be dismissed with prejudice. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 6 || Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(1). Within 14 days 7 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections 8 | with the Court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of objections. 9 || Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See Martinez v. 10 Yist,

(9th Cir. 1991). 1] 12 | Dated: November 14, 2025 Ss..c0_, 13 DENNIS M. COTA 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28