David McLemore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DAVID MCLEMORE, Case No. 1:25-cv-00511-JLT-EPG 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 11 v. DEFENDANT TRANSUNION, LLC ONLY 12 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al., (ECF No. 44) 13 Defendants.

15 On November 14, 2025, the parties filed a joint stipulation stating as follows: “Pursuant to | Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gv), Plaintiff and Defendant TransUnion, LLC hereby jointly stipulate | that TransUnion, LLC may be dismissed with prejudice, with each of the parties to bear their own 18 fees and costs. Plaintiff's claims against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. remain pending.” (ECF No. 44, | P- 1).

20 In light of the parties’ stipulation, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi), the case against only Defendant TransUnion, LLC has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate TransUnion, LLC as a °° pending defendant on the docket.

24 | IT IS SOORDERED.

Dated: _ November 17, 2025 [sf ey 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE