1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TARRENCE WOODARD, No. 2:25-cv-2433 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ORDER AND CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Defendants. 17 18 On October 8, 2025, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. 19 The second amended complaint was due on November 10, 2025, and plaintiff has not filed a 20 second amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

(9th 3 || Cir. 1991). 4 || Dated: November 21, 2025 Card Kt | (£4 (g—

6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 wood2433.fta

1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28