1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JONATHAN COLLIN AUTRY, Case No. 2:22-cv-0554-TLN-JDP (P) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jonathan Collin Autry (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed 18 this civil rights action seeking relief under

. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 23, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 107.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

(9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 Robbins v. Carey,

(9th Cir. 2007). The Court has reviewed the file and finds 27 the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s 28 analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed September 23, 2025 (ECF No. 107), are 3 | adopted in full; 4 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 85) is DENIED without prejudice; and 5 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial 6 | matters. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. / , / 8 | DATE: November 21, 2025 7, ? TROY L. NUNLEY 10 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28