United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

Marlin Wells v. Wallace

Marlin Wells v. Wallace
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided December 2, 2025
Marlin Wells v. Wallace

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARLIN WELLS, Case No. 1:25-cv-01679-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT A NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 13 v. PAUPERIS OR PAY THE $405.00 FILING FEE WALLACE, THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Marlin Wells (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). Plaintiff has neither paid the $405.00 filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to Plaintiff the attached application to proceed in forma 25 pauperis for a non-prisoner; 26 2. Within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall submit the 27 completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in 28 the alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee for this action; and 1 3. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4 Dated: December 2, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.