Larry L. Tionson v. Jeffrey Macomber, et al.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Larry L. Tionson v. Jeffrey Macomber, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY L. TIONSON, No. 2:24-cv-02898-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 JEFFREY MACOMBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state inmate, proceeds without counsel in an action brought under

42 U.S.C. § 17

1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 18

636(b)(1). 19 On September 5, 2025, the court ordered plaintiff to submit a signed complaint within 30 20 days. ECF No. 7. The order warned plaintiff that failure to submit a signed complaint would lead 21 to a recommendation that the case be dismissed. The time for acting has now passed and plaintiff 22 has not filed a signed complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 23 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require an operative complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 24 (“A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court.”). A complaint that is not 25 signed after a party has been given an opportunity to do so must be stricken. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 11(a); West v. Hulbert, No. 1:16-CV-00046-DAD,

2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64378

, at *1 (E.D. Cal. 27 May 16, 2016) (“Because the Court cannot consider unsigned filings, the complaint must be 28 1 | stricken”); Anderson v. Krpan, No. 1:14-CV-01380-AWWI,

2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11412

, at *5 2 | (E.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015) (same). Thus, plaintiff's unsigned complaint must be stricken. 3 Without an operative complaint, the action should be dismissed. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 4 |

963 F.2d 1258, 1262

(9th Cir. 1992). 5 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a district judge to 6 || this action. It is RECOMMENDED that the complaint be stricken and this action be dismissed 7 || without prejudice for failure to submit a signed complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). 8 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 9 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). Within fourteen days 10 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 11 || objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 12 || “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 13 || objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 14 | parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 15 || appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v. Duncan,

158 F.3d 449

, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez 16 | v. Yist,

951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991). 17 18 || Dated: December 2, 2025 _ittidl Hema EDMUND F. BRENNAN 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown