Allen Hammler v. J. Peluso, et al.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Allen Hammler v. J. Peluso, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 2:25-cv-03303 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J. PELUSO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with this civil rights action 18 under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. This action is referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302 19 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff has not paid the court’s filing fee or requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis 21 pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

. Typically, the court would provide plaintiff the opportunity to 22 submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. However, a review of court records shows that 23 another judge determined plaintiff was a three-strikes litigant before he filed the complaint in this 24 action on November 13, 2025. See Hammler v. Godfry, No. 1:25-cv-0728 KES-BAM (PC), 2025

25 WL 2391075

, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2025), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:25-cv- 26 0728 KES BAM (PC),

2025 WL 2695561

(E.D. Cal. Sept. 22, 2025). Because plaintiff has 27 accrued three prior strikes, he is precluded from proceeding in forma pauperis in this action 28 unless he is “under imminent danger of serious physical injury.”

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(g). ] The imminent danger exception applies at the time of filing the complaint. See Andrews 2 || v. Cervantes,

493 F.3d 1047, 1053

(9th Cir. 2007) (emphasizing that “it is the circumstances at 3 || the time of the filing of the complaint that matters for purposes of the ‘imminent danger’ 4 | exception to § 1915(g)”). Plaintiff has not alleged any facts in the complaint that suggest that he 5 || is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. The allegations pertain to an incident of 6 || excessive force on January 7, 2022, at a different prison than where plaintiff is incarcerated now. 7 || ECF No. 1 at 2-3. Plaintiff does not allege any facts that would suggest that the event is likely to 8 | reoccur. Thus, plaintiff must submit the appropriate filing fee in order to proceed with this action. 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff pay the entire $405.00 in filing 10 | fees within thirty days from the date of this order or face dismissal of the case. 11 | DATED: December 2, 2025 12 13 14 SEAN C. RIORDAN 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown