Rafael Perez Perez v. Warden, et al.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Rafael Perez Perez v. Warden, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAFAEL PEREZ PEREZ, Case No. 1:25-cv-1738-DAD-JDP (P) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 WARDEN, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

. Petitioner has also filed an application to proceed 19 in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and a motion for appointed counsel, ECF No. 3. The court has 20 conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas 21 Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 22 Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and is 23 granted. See

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a). Petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel, ECF 24 No. 3, will also be granted. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has 25 determined that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. 26

27 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other types of habeas corpus petitions including 28 § 2241 petitions. 1 § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also Weygandt v. Look,

718 F.2d 952, 954

(9th Cir. 1983). Within seven 2 days of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern District of California shall identify 3 counsel and send counsel’s contact information to [email protected], and counsel 4 will be added as counsel for petitioner. If counsel is not a member of the Eastern District of 5 California Criminal Justice Act Panel, within seven days of this Order the Federal Defender shall 6 file a motion to appoint counsel as CJA counsel pro hac vice. 7 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is GRANTED. 9 2. Petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3, is GRANTED. 10 3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of 11 petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

on the Federal 12 Defender, Attention: Habeas Appointment. 13 4. Within seven days of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern District of 14 California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to 15 [email protected], and counsel will be added as counsel for petitioner. If counsel 16 is not a member of the Eastern District of California Criminal Justice Act Panel, within seven 17 days of this Order the Federal Defender shall file a motion to appoint counsel as CJA counsel pro 18 hac vice. 19 5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of 20 petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

on the United 21 States Attorney. 22 6. Within seven days of petitioner’s counsel appearing, the parties shall file a joint status 23 report addressing any motions the parties anticipate filing and a proposed briefing schedule for 24 such motions. 25 7. In order to ensure this court’s jurisdiction to resolve the pending § 2241 petition, 26 respondent shall not transfer petitioner to another detention center outside of this judicial district, 27 pending further order of the court. See

28 U.S.C. § 1651

(a) (establishing the All Writs Act which 28 empowers the federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective 1 | jurisdictions. ...”); see also F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co.,

384 U.S. 597, 604

(1966) (emphasizing 2 | that federal courts have the power to “to preserve the court’s jurisdiction or maintain the status 3 | quo by injunction pending review of an agency’s action”); E-C-R v. Noem, No. 25-cv-1230-SI, 4 |

2025 WL 2300543

, at *1 n.1 (D. Or. July 16, 2025) (“Courts around the country exercise their 5 | authority under the All Writs Act to maintain their jurisdiction over pending immigration matters 6 || by preserving the status quo.”). 7 g IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ December 8, 2025 q———_ 10 JEREMY D. PETERSON i UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown