BMO Bank N.A. v. K&K Trans Inc, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA | BMO BANK N.A., Case No. 1:25-cv-00725-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT K&K 12] v. TRANS INC ONLY K&K TRANS INC, et al., (ECF No. 29) Defendants.

17 On December 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice 1g | as te Defendant K&K Trans Inc only. (ECF No. 29). Defendant K&K Trans Inc has not filed either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, in light of the notice, the case against Defendant K&K Trans Inc has ended and is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)@); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Defendant K&K Trans Inc as a defendant on the docket. Further, the Clerk of Court is directed to amend the case caption from “BMO Bank N.A. v. K & K Trans Inc et al” to “BMO Bank N.A. v. Singh.”

24 IT IS SO ORDERED. * Eu Po Lhe Dated: _ December 9, 2025 /s/ Cy 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE