United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2025

Robert Smythe v. Bailey, et al.

Robert Smythe v. Bailey, et al.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided December 11, 2025
Robert Smythe v. Bailey, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT SMYTHE, Case No. 1:25-cv-01624-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE SIGNED COMPLAINT 13 v. (ECF No. 5) BAILEY, et al., THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Robert Smythe (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19 On November 25, 2025, the Court issued an order striking Plaintiff’s complaint as unsigned and requiring Plaintiff to file a signed complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 5.)

22 On December 10, 2025, Plaintiff responded to the Court’s order by filing a copy of the final page of his complaint, including his signature. (ECF No. 7.)

24 Plaintiff is advised that because his original complaint was stricken as unsigned, he is required to file a complete and signed complaint in order to comply with the Court’s November 25, 2025 order. Merely filing the completed signature page of his complaint is not sufficient.

27 Plaintiff will therefore be granted a final opportunity to comply with the Court’s order to file a complete and signed complaint in order to proceed with this action.

1 Plaintiff is reminded that his complaint should be brief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), but it must state what each named defendant did that led to the deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights, Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009). Although accepted as true, the “[f]actual allegations must be [sufficient] to raise a right to relief above the speculative level . . . .” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citations omitted).

6 Finally, Plaintiff is advised that the signed complaint supersedes the original stricken complaint. Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012). Therefore, Plaintiff’s signed complaint must be “complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading.” Local Rule 220.

10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 11 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Plaintiff a civil rights complaint form; 12 2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a 13 complete and signed complaint (or file a notice of voluntary dismissal); and 14 3. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will recommend dismissal of 15 this action, with prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a 16 claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19 Dated: December 11, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.