Tyrell Ainsworth v. R. Hunter

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Tyrell Ainsworth v. R. Hunter

Trial Court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TYRELL AINSWORTH, No. 2:24-cv-1347 DAD CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 R. HUNTER, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

. By order filed November 4, 2025, the Court revoked plaintiff’s in forma 19 pauperis status and ordered plaintiff to pay the $405 filing fee within thirty days. (ECF No. 52.) 20 The Court warned plaintiff that failure to pay the required filing fee would result in dismissal of 21 this action. (Id.) Thirty days passed from November 4, 2025 and plaintiff did not pay the filing 22 fee. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local 24 Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst,

951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991). 4 5 || Dated: December 11, 2025 6 Aan Spe CHI SOO KIM 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 Ains1347.fr/2 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown