Zion Dwayne Mac Young, et al. v. Aramark
Zion Dwayne Mac Young, et al. v. Aramark
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ZION DWAYNE MAC YOUNG, et al., Case No. 25-cv-05478-JSC Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 9 10 ARAMARK, Defendant. 11 12 On October 24, 2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiffs’1 civil rights complaint for failure to 13 present a cognizable claim for relief. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiffs were granted leave to file an 14 amended complaint on or by November 26, 2025, and warned that if they did not do so the case 15 may be dismissed. They have not filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, 16 shown cause why not, or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. This case is accordingly 17 DISMISSED with prejudice. See WMX Technologies v. Miller,
104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 18 1997) (when complaint has been dismissed with leave to amend and plaintiff does not amend, 19 further district court determination is necessary). 20 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: December 12, 2025 23 24 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY 25 United States District Judge 26 27 1 Although the electronic docket only lists one plaintiff (Zion Young), as noted in the order of
Reference
- Status
- Unknown