Jane Heiting v. Momentus Technologies, LLC et al

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Jane Heiting v. Momentus Technologies, LLC et al

Trial Court Opinion

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-08246-SK Date: December 12, 2025 Title Jane Heiting v. Momentus Technologies, LLC et al

Present: The Honorable: Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge

Connie Chung n/a

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):

None present None present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

For the reason indicated below, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause on or before December 26, 2025 why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co.,

370 U.S. 626

(1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). Defendant Momentus Technologies, LLC did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff has failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff’s response. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Reference

Status
Unknown