Fred Feleki Martinez v. Coyle
Fred Feleki Martinez v. Coyle
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00958 JLT BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS 13 v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 COYLE, (Doc. 17) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Fred Feleki Martinez is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 18 in this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On November 19, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the first amended 20 complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to 21 state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 17.) The Court served the findings and 22 recommendations on Plaintiff and informed him that any objections were due within 14 days. 23 (Id.) The Court further advised Plaintiff that failure to file objections within the specified time 24 may result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal. 25 (Id. at 5 (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler,
772 F.3d 834, 838–39 (9th Cir. 2014)).) No objections 26 were filed, and the deadline to do so has expired. 27 According to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this 28 case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes the findings and 1 || recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 3 1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 19, 2025, (Doc. 17), are 4 ADOPTED IN FULL. 5 2. This action is DISMISSED, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim upon 6 which relief may be granted. 7 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: _ December 14, 2025 Cerin | Tower TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown