Yalfrison Enrique Duran-Rodriguez v. Kristi Noem, et al.
Yalfrison Enrique Duran-Rodriguez v. Kristi Noem, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YALFRISON ENRIQUE DURAN- Case No.: 25-cv-03096-CAB-DEB RODRIGUEZ, 12 ORDER REQUIRING A BOND Petitioner, 13 HEARING v. 14 [Doc. No. 1] KRISTI NOEM, et al., 15 Respondents. 16
17 Pending before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
18 U.S.C. § 2241filed by Yalfrison Enrique Duran-Rodriguez (“Petitioner”). [Doc. No. 1 19 (“Petition”).] Petitioner asserts he is being detained by Immigration and Customs 20 Enforcement (“ICE”) without a bond hearing in violation of
8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and the 21 Fifth Amendment. [Id. at 7–10.] 22 On December 19, 2025, Respondents filed a Supplemental Brief stating that: 23 Petitioner appears to be a member of the Bond Eligible Class certified in 24 Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, --- F. 25 Supp. 3d ---,
2025 WL 3288403(C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2025). The Bautista court has entered final judgement as to the Bond Eligible Class. Bautista, 26 [Doc. No.] 94. Accordingly, Respondents acknowledge that Petitioner is 27 detained under
8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and [is] entitled to an order from this Court directing a bond hearing be held pursuant to
8 U.S.C. § 1226(a). 28 1 [Doc. No. 10 at 2.] 2 The Court thus ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner an individualized bond 3 ||hearing before an immigration judge pursuant to
8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and its associated 4 ||/regulations by January 5, 2026. Respondents are further ORDERED to update this Court 5 the status of Petitioner’s bond hearing by January 7, 2026. Once Respondents confirm 6 || Petitioner has received an individualized bond hearing, the Court will dismiss the case. 7 It is SO ORDERED. 8 9 || Dated: December 22, 2025 □ 10 Hon. Cathy Ann Bencivengo United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown