Sueros & Bebidas Rehidratantes, S.A. de C.V., et al. v. Bargain Max Wholesale,...

United States District Court for the Eastern District of California

Sueros & Bebidas Rehidratantes, S.A. de C.V., et al. v. Bargain Max Wholesale,...

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3 4 5 6 7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 SUEROS & BEBIDAS REHIDRATANTES, Case No. 1:24-cv-00893-CDB S.A. DE C.V., et al., 12 ORDER ON STIPULATED JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, 13 (Doc. 52) 14 v.

15 BARGAIN MAX WHOLESALE, INC.,

16 Defendant. 17 18 Pending before the Court is the stipulated request for entry of judgment of Plaintiff Sueros 19 & Bebidas Rehidratantes, S.A. de C.V., and CAB Enteprises, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), and 20 Defendant Bargain Max Wholesale, Inc. (“Defendant”), filed on December 22, 2025. (Doc. 52). 21 The Court has reviewed the parties’ filings and finds good cause to order the stipulated injunctive 22 relief, as requested herein. Accordingly, the stipulated judgment is GRANTED as set forth below: 23 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED AND DECREED, upon good cause appearing, 24 that Judgment is entered as follows: 25 Defendant, its owners, partners, subsidiaries, affiliated companies, and the officers, directors, 26 principals, agents, servants, and employees of all of them and all others in active concert or 27 participation with Defendant are permanently enjoined and restrained from importing into or 28 marketing, advertising, offering for sale, distributing, dealing or selling products that bear the 1 |/Electrolit Marks (USPTO Reg. Nos. 4222726, 4833885, 4717350, and 4717232) and that are not 2 ||manufactured for sale in the United States. 3 It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purposes of 4 |/enforcing the terms of the stipulated judgment and permanent injunction. 5 And IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purposes of 6 |lenforcing the terms of the settlement agreement for two years from the date of this order. See 7 ||Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.,

511 U.S. 375, 381-82

(1994) (explaining that district 8 ||courts may retain ancillary jurisdiction to enforce settlement agreements). 9 The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. 10 }IT IS SO ORDERED. M Dated: _ December 23, 2025 | Ww V □ RK 12 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER AMENDING STIPULATED JUDGMENT

Reference

Full Case Name
Sueros & Bebidas Rehidratantes, S.A. de C.V., et al. v. Bargain Max Wholesale, Inc.
Status
Unknown