Kevin Hagan v. Dr. Grace Woo, et al.

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN HAGAN, No. 1:25-cv-00116-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING 13 v. THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM DR. GRACE WOO, et al., (Doc. 16) 15 Defendants.

17 Kevin Hagan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 28, 2025, Plaintiff filed an initial complaint alleging that he was denied proper medical care while incarcerated and that CDCR was retaliating against him for his prior lawsuits. (Doc. 1.) On June 24, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found that the complaint failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 12.) On August 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (Doc. 15.), which the Court screened and found to fail to state a claim. (Doc. 16.)

On October 29, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissing this action for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 16.)

The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and informed him that objections were due in 30 days. (Id. at 9.) Plaintiff was further is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. (Id. (citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) No objections were filed and the | time to do so has passed.

3 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de | novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings || and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

6 | Thus, the Court ORDERS: 7 1. The findings and recommendations issued on October 29, 2025, are ADOPTED 8 IN FULL. (Doc. 16.)

9 2. This action is dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a cognizable claim 10 upon which relief may be granted; and 11 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 Dated: _ December 31, 2025 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE