United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2025

Gildardo M. Pacheco v. Superior Court of Orange County

Gildardo M. Pacheco v. Superior Court of Orange County
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided December 22, 2025
Gildardo M. Pacheco v. Superior Court of Orange County

Trial Court Opinion

O

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GILDARDO M. PACHECO, Case No. 2:24-cv-03152-CAS-SSC Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING 13 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE JUDGE AND DENYING COUNTY, CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 17 Respondent.

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 the Court has reviewed the petition, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. The Court (1) accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation, (2) grants Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF 14); (3) denies Petitioner’s motion for leave to submit two demurrers pending an active civil hearing (ECF 21); and (4) denies Petitioner’s motion for restoration of filing protocol (ECF 32).

27 IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the petition | refiling grounds three and four in a civil-rights action if Petitioner | wishes to pursue such relief.

3 Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a | substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the | court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of | appealability will not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); | Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); | Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 478, 484 (2000).

9 | DATED: December 22, 2025 10 □ Abrupt fh. Angde_ 12 HONORABLE CHRISTINA A. SNYDER 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.