United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2026

Flor Alvarez v. Moises Becerra, et al.

Flor Alvarez v. Moises Becerra, et al.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 6, 2026
Flor Alvarez v. Moises Becerra, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FLOR ALVAREZ, No. 1:26-cv-00008 DC SCR 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER MOISES BECERRA, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner is an immigration detainee proceeding through counsel in this habeas action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner had paid the required filing fee. District Judge Coggins has referred the proceedings to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c) and 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). ECF No. 4.

21 The undersigned has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, and because of the serious nature of the allegations that respondents have not articulated a basis for her detention, that she does not appear in either the online detainee locator system or the EOIR 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other types of habeas corpus petitions including § 2241 petitions.

1 | system, and that respondents are pressuring her to sign documents she does not understand while || represented, respondents will be directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by | filing an answer/return within 7 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243.

4 | Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 3 days after being served a copy of || it.

6 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 7 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer/return within 7 days from the date of this | order. If an answer/return is filed, respondent shall include with the answer/return any and all || transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the | application.

11 2. Petitioner’s reply/traverse, if any, is due within 3 days after being served a copy of | respondent’s answer/return.

13 3. Absent a further order of the court, the petition will be taken under submission after the | filing of the reply/traverse.

15 4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of || petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the United | States Attorney.

18 5. In order to ensure this court’s jurisdiction to resolve the pending § 2241 petition, | respondent shall not transfer petitioner to another detention center outside of this judicial district, || pending further order of the court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) (establishing the All Writs Act which || empowers the federal courts to “issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective | jurisdictions....”); see also F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 604 (1966) (emphasizing that || federal courts have the power to “to preserve the court’s jurisdiction or maintain the status quo by | injunction pending review of an agency’s action”).

25 || DATED: January 6, 2026 27 SEAN C. RIORDAN 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.