Yojelsy David Colmenares Mendoza v. Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and...

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YOJELSY DAVID COLMENARES Case No.: 26-cv-11-JES-VET MENDOZA, ORDER: Petitioner, v. (1) REQUIRING A RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, U.S. 15 HABEAS CORPUS; IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, SAN DIEGO; and (2) SETTING BRIEFING WARDEN, OTAY MESA DETENTION 17 SCHEDULE; AND CENTER, Respondents. (3) STAYING REMOVAL OF 19 PETITIONER TO PRESERVE JURISDICTION 22 Before the Court is Petitioner Yojelsy David Colmenares Mendoza’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Respondents are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Petition should not be granted by filing a written Response by January 9, 2026. Petitioner MAY FILE an optional Traverse in support of the Petition by January 16, 2026.

27 To preserve the Court’s jurisdiction pending a ruling in this matter, Petitioner shall not be removed from the United States or this District unless and until the Court orders || otherwise. See Doe v. Bondi, Case. No. 25-cv-805-BJC-JLB, 2025 WL 1870979 at *2 (S.D. ||Cal. June 11, 2025) (“Federal courts retain jurisdiction to preserve the status quo while ||determining whether it has subject matter jurisdiction over a case and while a petition is || pending resolution from the court.’’) (citing cases); A.M. v. LaRose et al., 25-cv-01412, || ECF No. 2 (S.D. Cal. June 4, 2025) (“Pursuant to Petitioner’s request for a Temporary ||restraining order, the Court hereby (1) RESTRAINS and ENJOINS Respondents, their || agents, employees, successors, attorneys, and all persons in active concert and participation || with them, from removing Petitioner A.M. from the United States or this District pending || further order of this Court”); see also A.A.R.P v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 97 (2025) (finding || that federal courts have “the power to issue injunctive relief to prevent irreparable harm to 11 applicant and to preserve [] jurisdiction over the matter.”); Nguyen v. Scott, No. 2:25- ||}CV-01398, 2025 WL 2097979, at *3 (W.D. Wash. July 25, 2025) (enjoining the ||Respondents from removing Petitioner without approval from the court).

14 IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 || Dated: January 7, 2026 16 Sa— 17 Honorable James E. Sunmons Jr. 18 United States District Judge