United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2026

Mandy Coberly v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Mandy Coberly v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 7, 2026
Mandy Coberly v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

1 Francesco Benavides, CSBN 258924 Law Offices of Francesco Benavides 2 1990 N. California Blvd. 8th Floor Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Tel: (925) 222-7071 4 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Plaintiff MANDY COBERLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION MANDY COBERLY, Case No. 2:25-cv-01860-WBS-CSK 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND 14 v. EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE 15 EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT; FRANK BISIGNANO, ORDER Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $7,624.99, under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d), 1920.

26 The parties stipulate that the position of the United States was not substantially justified in this case, and therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to attorney fees pursuant to 1 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, Francesco Benavides, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff.

Payments may be made by electronic funds transfer (EFT) or by check.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Francesco Benavides, including the Law Offices of Francesco Benavides, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of Francesco Benavides to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

Respectfully submitted, Dated: December 22, 2025 Law Offices of Francesco Benavides 26 By: /s/ Francesco Benavides 27 FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: December 22, 2025 ERIC GRANT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE 4 Head of Program Litigation 1 Social Security Administration 6 By: Katherine Watson* KATHERINE WATSON Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 (*Permission to use electronic signature obtained via email on December 22, 2025).

1 ORDER 2 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the || amount of $7,624.99 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and no costs under 28 U.S.C. || § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation.

8 othe thik be — g Dated: January 6, 2026 WILLIAM B. SHUBB 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE _4-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.