United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 2026

Utkarshkumar Umar Trivedi v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Utkarshkumar Umar Trivedi v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of California · Decided January 8, 2026
Utkarshkumar Umar Trivedi v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UTKARSHKUMAR UMAR TRIVEDI, Case No. 1:26-cv-0041-DC-JDP (P) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and a motion for appointed counsel, ECF No. 3. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 22 Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis makes the required showing and is granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner’s motion for the appointment of counsel is also granted. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also 27 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules to other types of habeas corpus petitions including § 2241 petitions.

1 Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Within seven days of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to [email protected], and counsel will be added as counsel for petitioner. If counsel is not a member of the Eastern District of California Criminal Justice Act Panel, within seven days of this Order the Federal Defender shall file a motion to appoint counsel as CJA counsel pro hac vice.

7 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is GRANTED.

9 2. Petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 3, is GRANTED.

10 3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the Federal Defender, Attention: Habeas Appointment.

13 4. Within seven days of this order, the appointing authority for the Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send counsel’s contact information to [email protected], and counsel will be added as counsel for petitioner. If counsel is not a member of the Eastern District of California Criminal Justice Act Panel, within seven days of this Order the Federal Defender shall file a motion to appoint counsel as CJA counsel pro hac vice.

19 5. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the United States Attorney.

22 6. Within seven days of petitioner’s counsel appearing, the parties shall file a joint status report addressing any motions the parties anticipate filing and a proposed briefing schedule for such motions. > IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: _ January 8, 2026 q-—— 4 JEREMY D. PETERSON 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.