United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 2026

Yojelsy David Colmenares Mendoza v. Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and...

Yojelsy David Colmenares Mendoza v. Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and...
United States District Court for the Southern District of California · Decided January 12, 2026
Yojelsy David Colmenares Mendoza v. Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and...

Trial Court Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA YOJELSY DAVID COLMENARES Case No.: 3:26-cv-11-JES-VET MENDOZA, ORDER FOR BOND HEARING Petitioner, v. FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, SAN DIEGO; and WARDEN, OTAY MESA DETENTION CENTER, Respondents.

20 Before the Court is Petitioner Yojelsy David Colmenares Mendoza’s (“Petitioner”) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. Pursuant to the Court’s OSC order, Respondents filed a response. ECF No. 4. In the response, Respondents acknowledged that Petitioner must be considered detained under 8 U.S.C. § 24 1226(a), pursuant to the final judgment entered in Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2025 WL 3289861 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2025). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART the petition as follows: 27 // 1 (1) The Court ORDERS Respondents to provide Petitioner with a bond 2 determination hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within ten days of this Order.

3 At the hearing, Respondents may not deny Petitioner bond on the basis that 4 he is detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2); and 5 (2) Respondents are ORDERED to File a Notice of Compliance within five days 6 of providing Petitioner with a bond redetermination hearing, including 7 apprising the Court of the results of the hearing.

8 ||In addition, Petitioner raises a due process violation and as an alternative to bond, also requests release from custody. ECF No. | at 3-4. Respondents’ return does not address any ||issues other than Maldonado Bautista’s application to the case. See ECF No. 4.

11 || Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Respondents to file a supplemental brief, addressing any ||remaining arguments they wish to raise in response to the petition by January 16, 2025.

13 IT IS SO ORDERED.

14 || Dated: January 12, 2026 15 “| or 16 Honorable James E. Sunmons Jr. 7 United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.