PARDIS MUSIC, INC. v. CALTEX TRADING, INC.; CALTEX RECORDS; CALTEX MUSIC LLC;...

1 || ALIR. MIRHOSSEINI, ESQ.[Bar No.149919] MIRHOSSEINI LAW GROUP, APC || 1502 N. Broadway, Santa Ana, California 92706 3 Telephone: (714) 560-9100 Facsimile: (714) 560-9120 || E-Mail: [email protected] || Attorneys for Plaintiff,PARDIS MUSIC, INC. J S-6 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PARDIS MUSIC, INC., a California Case No.2:25-cv-09476-HDV-MAR corporation, 10 Plaintiff, {PROPOSED+-ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND THE 11 CASE TO THE ORIGINATING STATE COURT CALTEX TRADING, INC., a California [Concurrently filed Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand 13. || corporation, CALTEX RECORDS, a business and Declaration of Ali R. Mirhosseini in support organization form unknown; CALTEX MUSIC thereof] || LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, MEHRDAD PAKRAVAN, an individual; and JUDGE: Honorable Hernan D. Vera || DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, DATE: January 8, 2026 TIME: 10:00 a.m.

16 Defendants. Courtroom:5B {PROPOSED-ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND THE CASE TO THI ORIGINATING STATE COURT 1 On October 30, 2025, Plaintiff PARDIS MUSIC, INC. (‘PARDIS MUSIC”) filed a motion |}remand this case back to the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. Concurrent with 1 3 Motion, PARDIS MUSIC filed an amended Complaint as matter of course, and removed the feder || copyright infringement and injunctive relief causes of actions for PARDIS MUSIC currently does not ha 5 registered copyright registration.

6 Having carefully considered the briefing and arguments submitted in this matter, the Court orders 7 follows: 8 1. The Case is remanded back to the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles becau: 9 this Court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction because the Complaint, as amended, 10 only contains state law claims.

11 2. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over PARDIS MUSIC’s remainir 12 state law claims. Acri v. Varian Associates, 114 F.3d 999, 1000 (9th Cir. 1997).

14 ISSO ORDERED.

16 || Dated: 01/09/26 H AN D. VERA 17 | UNITED STATES 4 TRAST Ze 4PROPOSED} ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND THE CASE TO THI ORIGINATING STATE COURT