United States District Court for the Central District of California, 2026

Farshad Kashani v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.

Farshad Kashani v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.
United States District Court for the Central District of California · Decided January 16, 2026
Farshad Kashani v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FARSHAD KASHANI CASE NO: 2:25−cv−04376−FMO−AS 10 Plaintiff(s), 11 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS , et al. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 Defendant(s).

Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.