Farshad Kashani v. City of Beverly Hills, et al.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FARSHAD KASHANI CASE NO: 2:25−cv−04376−FMO−AS 10 Plaintiff(s), 11 v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS , et al. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 Defendant(s).
Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. Failure to re-open or seek an extension of time to re-open the action by the deadline set forth above shall be deemed as consent by the parties to dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.