Gabriel Gonzalez, on behalf of others similarly situated v. Jeld-Wen, Inc. and...

] 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA |] GABRIEL GONZALEZ, on behalf of Case No. 3:24-cv-01116-JO-DTF others similarly situated CLASS ACTION 8 Plaintiff, Qn □ 14 [PROPOSED| Order Dismissing Entire vs Action Without Prejudice Pursuant to Id , Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) || JELD-WEN, INC. and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Removal Date: June 27, 2024 7 Complaint Filed: May 23, 2024 18 Defendants.

Order Dismissing Entire Action Without Prejudice Pursuant to 1 On January 20, 2026, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action without || prejudice. All parties have agreed to the dismissal.

3 In light of the stipulation, the case has been dismissed without prejudice pursuant || to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i1); see also || Ripley v. Bridgestone Retail Ops., LLC., No. CO09-1482 RSM, 2010 WL 11684294, at || *2 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 2, 2010) (citing Moore’s Federal Practice 3d, § 23.64[2][a] || (2007)); see also Richey v. GetWellNetwork, Inc., No. 20-cv-2205-BEN-BLM, 2021 || WL 424281, at *3 (“Because no class has been certified in this case, Rule 23 does not || mandate either court approval of the instant settlement or notice to putative class || members” [quoting Allred v. Chicago Title Co., No. 19CV2129-LAB (AHG), 2020 || WL 5847550, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2020]).

12 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

14 IT IS SO ORDERED.

15 Qe || Dated: 1/21/2026 7 HON. JINSOOK OHTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -l- Case No. 3:24-cv-01116-JO-DTF Order TDiiemiceing Entire Actinn Withnit Preindice Purenant to